Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
"Bias Determination and Inverse Source..."
  • Bias Determination and Inverse Source Identification with MOPITT and MOZART
2
Role of CO in the tropopshere
  • Oxidation capacity of the atmosphere
    • main sink for OH, impacts t HC, GHG...
    • impact on ozone
  • Precursor of tropospheric ozone
    • air quality
    • climate
  • Indoor and Urban pollutant
    • people’s health
3
Global Budget of CO in the troposphere
  • The nature of CO sources and sinks are fairly well established:


  • 1. CO is a byproduct of the incomplete combustion of fossil fuel and biomass.


  • 2. Significant amount of CO also comes from the oxidation of hydrocarbons, mainly methane.


  • 3. CO averaged global lifetime is 2 months.


  • 4. 90 % of CO sink is due to its reaction with the hydroxyl radicals OH (the rest being due to dry deposition).


  • 5. CO sources and sink are quite variable in time and space.
  • č CO global budget still highly uncertain
4
"For the first time,"
  • For the first time, scientists get a broader and finer picture of CO distribution thanks to the MOPITT instrument onboard NASA Terra satellite MOPITT which measures tropospheric content of CO covering the global surface of the Earth in a few days.
5
March 2000 Total column of CO :
 MOZART2 (top) and MOPITT (bottom)
6
July 2000 Total column of CO :
 MOZART2 (top) and MOPITT (bottom)
7
Hypothesis
  • Transport in the model is perfect (for the CMDL/IMAGES inversion)


  • Statistics of the observations known (mean and cov matrix)


  • Statistics of the a priori sources known


  • All Errors are gaussian and independent


  • Chemistry weakly non linear. CO sink not optimized.
    • a posteriori sources close ENOUGH to a priori        č no big change in [OH]                                    č Use linearized version of the model
8
The solution of the inverse
 problem minimizes a cost function
9
 
10
Optimal Interpolation
  • Analytical solution xa exists for linear problem (or weakly non-linear)
11
Principle
  • The discrepancies between the observed and the modeled CO distributions are used to optimize poorly known parameters in the model – here, CO surface emissions.
12
"In this talk we present..."
  • In this talk we present two results pertinent to assimilation and inverse modeling of trace gases in the troposphere. Both are related to MOPITT CO measurements.

    Persistent model biases can significantly affect the quality and success of the trace gas assimilation. A bias correction scheme proposed by Dee and Da Silva for humidity assimilation was adopted to MOPITT CO assimilation in a global 3-D CTM MOZART 2 and used to identify the biases and improve the assimilation. To our knowledge this is a first application of this technique to trace gas analysis.

    Uncertainties in the sources of tropospheric trace gases such as CO can be rather large. Errors in the source strength can thus severely influence model simulations and lead to incorrect results. We present final results of a 3-year project on numerical identification of global surface sources of CO  obtained via inverse modeling with MOPITT and MOZART.


13
MOZART 2 MODEL
  • 3-D chemistry-transport model
  • Full tropospheric chemistry, with analyzed H2O fields (NCEP and ECMWF analyses)
  • ~ 60 species and ~ 200 reactions.
  • 2.8o x 2.8o horizontal resolution on the NCEP 28 sigma-vertical levels with ~ 7 levels below 850 mb
  • 20 min time step


14
CO emitted by factories in Colorado on December 7 2000
15
Time evolution of CO plume
16
Modeling and Data Assimilation
  • Physics-based numerical models can be used to simulate spread of air-borne agents.
  • These models rely on a set of input parameters (winds, temperatures, surface fluxes, etc) that contain errors.
  • Additionally, model representations of the actual physical processes also contain errors.
  • In order to accurately monitor and predict evolution of air-borne pollutant one needs to reduce these errors using data in the process called Data Assimilation.
17
 
18
MOPITT AVERAGING KERNELS
19
MOPITT CO RETRIEVALS
20
Major mechanisms that control
CO distribution
21
 
22
TRACER ASSIMILATION: VARIANCE EQUATION and MODEL (CTM) ERRORS
23
Optimization of the monthly CO emissions using Phase-I MOPITT data based on approach of Petrone et al., JGR,2002
24
Online bias-estimator in the CDA with the MOPITT CO retrievals
25

Two-stage bias correction algorithm
26
Bias-state evaluation algorithm for the MOPITT CO retrievals
27
Bias forecast equation
28
CO April 2001 at 700 mb
29
Fig 3
30
 
31
 
32
 
33
Seasonal Variations of the Surface CO
34
Seasonal Variations of the Surface CO
35
 
36
Looking at MOPITT minus FORECAST CO fields
37
Monthly mean OmF (ppbv) at 700 mb, March 2001
38
ASSIMILATION and CTM  RESULTS
39
ASSIMILATION and CTM  RESULTS
40
Seasonal Variations of the Surface CO
41
 
42
Tracer data analysis: Conclusions and Challenges
43
Mathematical Basis
44
Source Identification (Inverse Modeling)
45
Wireless Sensor Nets – Good Things
  • Wireless sensor networks show a great promise in advancing our ability to provide data for an assimilation system.
  • Since the sensors are inexpensive, data coverage can be increased dramatically.
  • Wireless communication ability facilitates data collection and can eliminate operational delays.


46
Wireless Sensor Nets – Bad Things
  • Low sensor cost often results in low S/N and low sensitivities and selectivities.
  • Low production costs for the integrated board can lead to large (and often changing) biases, higher fault frequencies, and large errors.
  • Unless a GPS chip and a GPS antenna are included on the board, position determination is a big issue.


47
What one can expect
  • Lifetime: 5yr+
  • Calibration time: 5-10 minutes per sensor
  • Time between calibrations: months to years
  • Cost: $20 to $50 (tens), $10 to $15 (10,000's)
  • Power: 50 to 500mW continuous during operation (adding GPS on board will reduce this)
48
Sensor Response Examples
49
Wireless Sensor Nets
(from Kevin L. Moore, Director
Center for Self-Organizing and Intelligent Systems
Utah State University)
50
Wireless Sensor Nets
(from Kevin L. Moore, Director
Center for Self-Organizing and Intelligent Systems
Utah State University)
51
Wireless Sensor Nets
(from Kevin L. Moore, Director
Center for Self-Organizing and Intelligent Systems
Utah State University)
52
Wireless Sensor Nets
(from Kevin L. Moore, Director
Center for Self-Organizing and Intelligent Systems
Utah State University)
53
Conclusions
  • Modern design schemes for wireless sensor nets tend to include a software “integrator” and control module.
  • Numerical atmospheric models and data assimilation methods readily provide such back end module for airborne agent tracking.
  • Bayesian approach inherent in all data assimilation schemes provides a rigorous framework for dealing with low-cost sensor errors and biases.
  • Wireless sensor net implementation issues can be rather complex. Practical problems related to coordinated communication, queries and power consumption will be reviewed tomorrow by Dr M. Murphy



54
Emissions Validation
55
 
56
 
57
 
58
 
59
 
60
 
61
 
62
 
63
 
64
 
65
 
66
 
67
Time Evolution of 150 ppb
 CO iso-surface
68
 
69
Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr
70
May, Jun, Jul, Aug
71
Sep, Oct, Nov, dec
72
 
73
TRACE-P
74
TOPSE, 6 flights
75
CMDL
76
CMDL Stations
77
 
78
TRACE-P
79
Introduction
  • Carbon monoxide, CO,  is a byproduct of fossil fuel and biomass incomplete combustion. The incomplete oxidation of hydrocarbons also produces substantial amounts of CO.
  • CO is the principal sink of hydroxyl radicals OH in the free troposphere. Its global mean lifetime is 2 months. CO controls indirectly the lifetime of many other species, such as methane CH4. In presence of nitrogen oxides, NOx (>10-15 pptv), and sunlight, CO is a precursor of tropospheric ozone O3.
  • The uncertainties on CO sources are as high as a factor of 2 to 4.
  • The objective of the study is to combine the information contained in a numerical and in observations to improve CO surface emissions.